Montesquieu v. Heil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \Wisconsin courts traditionally look to federal law to interpret substantive violations of the Wisconsin antitrust statutes\
• crediting the relative ease of travel in and out of Chicago by air
• “Moreover, defendants witnesses will be inconvenienced regardless of the forum because they are located in various parts of the country.”
• “[T]he Supreme Court left important questions unanswered, including ‘[i]f the [forum selection] clause applies to only some parties or claims but not others, how should the court review a transfer motion?’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).