Montes Mock, Miriam v. Pedroza Rodriguez, Jose E

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because petitioner was diligent, \the appropriate question is whether [petitioner] was entitled to a hearing under pre-AEDPA law\
• concluding that because petitioner was diligent, “the appropriate question is whether [petitioner] was entitled to a hearing under pre-AEDPA law”
• recognizing counsel's legitimate concern that testimony about defendant's mental health \might play into the prosecution's case that [defendant] was a continuing threat to society\
• recognizing counsel’s legitimate concern that testimony about defendant’s mental health “might play into the prosecution’s case that [defendant] was a continuing threat to society”
• applying de novo review where the defendant sought an evidentiary hearing before the OCCA and attached affidavits, but the OCCA decided the case with only a minor reference to the new evidence
• applying de novo review where the defendant sought an evidentiary hearing before the OCCA and attached affidavits, but the OCCA decided the case with only a minor reference to the new evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).