Skip to main content
· 6/5/1916

Montelibano Y Ramos v. La Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas

Citations

  • 241 U.S. 455
  • 36 S. Ct. 617
  • 60 L. Ed. 1099
  • 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1724

Syllabus

<p>In an action of an equitable nature the proper method of review by this court of the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands under the act of July 1, 1902, § 10, is by appeal and not by writ of error.</p> <p>Where both courts below concurred in findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is the duty of this court to affirm their judgment unless it appears that they clearly erred; and so held in a case involving the construction of, and transactions under, an agreement special in form, whose true construction was in controversy.</p>

Judges: Pitney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.