Monteith v. Litchenburger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “this Court may consider an unpreserved issue if the question is one of law and all the facts necessary for its resolution have been presented”
• remanding issue to trial court for first determination where the issue was not addressed because of erroneous predicate ruling
• remanding the case to the trial court for it to make a determination regarding whether a genuine issue of material fact existed
• interpreting the language of an insurance policy and, where the trial court had not made -7- the requisite findings of fact, remanding to the trial court to determine the policy’s factual application
• collateral estoppel serves to “prevent[] inconsistent decisions”
• collateral estoppel serves to “prevent[] inconsistent decisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).