Montano v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• driving an 8-foot-wide truck in an alley less than 16 feet wide, where the ordinance required vehicles using the alley to leave at least 10 feet unobstructed
• a delivery person who violated a city ordinance when stopping his delivery truck in an alley could not be an intended user of the alley
• “We cannot use definitions in the Illinois Vehicle Code to construe the terms of an ordinance in the Chicago Municipal Code”
• a delivery person who violated a city ordinance when stopping his delivery truck in an alley could not be an intended user of the alley
• “We cannot use definitions in the Illinois Vehicle Code to construe the terms of an ordinance in the Chicago Municipal Code.”
• “We also hold that, even if Montano did not violate [the ordinance], he would not be an intended user of the alley.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).