Montanez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Testimony regarding conversations between spouses who are joint participants in a crime is not protected by the marital communications privilege.\
• \Testimony regarding conversations between spouses who are joint participants in a crime is not protected by the marital communications privilege.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Drayton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-06-12· cited 62×
• J.M.M. v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Russell Circuit Court: CC-20-755)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2025-05-02
• A.E.M. v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Russell Circuit Court: CC-20-754)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2025-05-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Henderson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-11-16· cited 148×
• Blanco v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-05-12· cited 50×
• Blount v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-08-24· cited 46×
• Self v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-11-17· cited 17×
• Ex parte State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-06-29· cited 16×
• State v. Browder
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-03-11· cited 10×