Montana, W. & S. R. v. Morley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting intervention where venue would not be proper for intervenors, noting the lack of “authority for the proposition that venue rules apply only to the original named plaintiffs and not to intervening, later-named plaintiffs”
• employment discrimination claim; court noted that class members were “scattered throughout the United States” and that they feared retaliation from employer if they sued individually

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).