MONTAGUE, KIM v. BROOKS, JASON A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the reference to § 1324a makes it clear that seeking private employment qualifies as a purpose or benefit under the statute
• noting that the reference to § 1324a makes it clear that seeking private employment qualifies as a purpose or benefit under the statute
• issue was exhausted where the brief invoked the statutory text that furnished the argument without “mak[ing] the precise argument we now consider”
• “We do not employ the exhaustion doctrine in a formalistic manner.” (quoting Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1083 (9th Cir. 2011))
• “To satisfy the exhaustion requirement, Diaz needed to ‘put the BIA on notice’ in his appeal from the IJ’s removal order.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).