Skip to main content
· 12/15/2004

MONTAGE GROUP v. Athle-Tech Computer Sys.

Citations

  • 889 So. 2d 180
  • 2004 WL 2892394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was appropriate to award prejudgment interest where “damages for unjust enrichment can be liquidated” to a certain date
  • holding that trial court’s failure to make written findings upon denying defendant’s bond request required reversal
  • holding that it was appropriate to award prejudgment interest where “damages for unjust enrichment can be liquidated” to a certain date
  • holding that it was appropriate to award pre-judgment interest where “damages for unjust enrichment can be liquidated” to a certain date
  • concluding that a plaintiff's proof of claimed business damages were inadequate to support the jury's business damage award because it was \far too speculative and uncertain\
  • recognizing that the value of a business reflects its future profits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.