Monta H. Penton v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The argument that Crown employed persons who could have performed appellant’s particular task, without more, does little more than muddy the waters.”
• relevant issue is “whether the magnitude and type of Crown’s update and modification of the Bogalusa plant facility was part of its usual and customary practice”; “full airing of (Crown’s) day-to-day operations” needed for resolution of issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).