· 12/22/2009
Monson v. Drug Enforcement Administration
Citations
- 589 F.3d 952
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28175
- 2009 WL 4912102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that challenge to rule promulgated under CSA must be filed in court of appeals
- reiterating that “[t]here was no final decision of the DEA to be reviewed”
- “Unlike the applicant in John Doe, Inc., . . . [plaintiffs] did not file their complaint in the District Court seeking review of a final action by the DEA under the CSA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Melloy, Bowman, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.