Skip to main content
· 12/22/2009

Monson v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Citations

  • 589 F.3d 952
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28175
  • 2009 WL 4912102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that challenge to rule promulgated under CSA must be filed in court of appeals
  • reiterating that “[t]here was no final decision of the DEA to be reviewed”
  • “Unlike the applicant in John Doe, Inc., . . . [plaintiffs] did not file their complaint in the District Court seeking review of a final action by the DEA under the CSA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Bowman, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.