Monson v. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiff contends that the word ‘may' in the foregoing statute is permissive only, and does not charge the peace officer with a duty to make an arrest. On the contrary, we think the statute imposes a duty on peace officers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Matthew Elliot Cohagan
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2017-08-24· cited 47×
• Farm Bureau Fin. Co., Inc. v. Carney
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 43×
• Beehler v. Fremont County
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-04-14· cited 17×
• Roper v. Elkhorn at Sun Valley
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-02-01· cited 17×
• Padgett v. Williams
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1960-01-29· cited 15×
• Mosman v. Mathison
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 12×
• State v. Whelan
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-09-15· cited 9×
• Keller v. Magic Water Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-04-01· cited 9×
• Garren v. Butigan
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1973-04-19· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pigg v. Brockman
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1957-07-18· cited 41×
• Argetakis v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1923-01-25· cited 28×
• People v. Perry
  California Court of Appeal· 1947-05-07· cited 20×
• Lees v. Colgan
  California Supreme Court· 1898-03-11· cited 18×
• State v. Robinson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1951-04-24· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1867-11-15· cited 6×
• Cohn v. Sorenson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1923-10-30· cited 1×