Monsma v. Monsma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• federal employee retirement benefits statute did not preempt state marital property law so that trial court correctly considered federal benefits to be a marital asset
• federal employee retirement benefits statute did not preempt state marital property law so that trial court correctly considered federal benefits to be a marital asset
• vested federal civil service retirement benefits are a divisible marital asset
• vested federal civil service retirement benefits are a divisible marital asset
• vested federal civil service retirement benefits are marital assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).