Skip to main content
· 2/17/1998

Monsanto Co. v. Gould Electronics, Inc.

Citations

  • 965 S.W.2d 314
  • 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 306
  • 1998 WL 60868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ¢“[P]re-judgment interest is not owed prior to March 1993, because Monsanto failed to make Gould aware of the definite amount owed prior to March 1993.”
  • “indemnitee has the right to recover attorney’s fees reasonably incurred in the defense of a claim, provided the indemnitor has notice of the law suit and an opportunity to defend.”
  • “Here, [Respondent] and [Appellant] are sophisticated commercial entities. [Respondent] agreed to indemnify [Appellant] from ‘any and all liabilities .... ’ Such terms clearly and unequivocally provide for [Respondent] to indemnify [Appellant] against any and all claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd, Simon, Hoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.