Skip to main content
· 8/10/1981

Monsanto Co. v. Ford

Citations

  • 534 F. Supp. 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a distribution through a marriage dissolution proceeding of a husband's interest in an employee benefit plan which was not in \pay status\ violated ERISA's preemption and anti-alienation provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cahill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.