Monsanto Chemical Co. v. American Bitumuls Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• one party’s obligation to carry ‘adequate’ insurance for the benefit of both parties satisfies in full that party’s claim against the other party
• one party’s obligation to carry ‘adequate’ insurance for the benefit of both parties satisfies in full that party’s claim against the other party
• Missouri Supreme Court held an insurance procurement provision in contract requiring Monsanto to carry adequate insurance to cover materials held by Cal-Spray satisfied Monsanto’s claims for compensation for negligence against Cal-Spray when materials were destroyed by fire
• Missouri Supreme Court held an insurance procurement provision in contract requiring Monsanto to carry adequate insurance to cover materials held by Cal-Spray satisfied Monsanto’s claims for compensation for negligence against Cal-Spray when materials were destroyed by fire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).