Monroe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the removal of the 1994 offenses from the 1993 scoresheet resulted in a lowering of the sentencing range by one cell, remand for resentencing upon a properly calculated scoresheet was required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bruce v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-24· cited 2×
• Parks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-05· cited 2×
• Card v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-02· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Orsi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-10-09· cited 17×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-07· cited 16×
• Heath v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-31· cited 12×
• Tubwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-12· cited 4×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-20· cited 2×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-18· cited 2×
• Taunton v. Tilton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-10· cited 1×