Monroe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a claim that is \conclusory and facially insufficient\ should be stricken with leave to amend
• reversing summary denial of “conclusory and facially insufficient” claim and remanding in accord with Spera
• relying on Dodd to reverse and remand on a rule 3.850 claim concerning a discrepancy in drug weights indicative of probable tampering
• reversing and remanding summary denial of conclusory claim pursuant to Spera

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DELAROSA v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-30· cited 4×
• Rosa v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-12· cited 1×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-15· cited 1×
• Mayes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-11
• DARRELL MATTHEWS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-12-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spera v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-01· cited 504×
• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-23· cited 19×
• Allied Discount Tires v. Cook
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-14· cited 8×
• Monroe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-08· cited 1×