Skip to main content
· 5/15/1968

Monroe v. Livingston

Citations

  • 161 S.E.2d 243
  • 251 S.C. 214
  • 1968 S.C. LEXIS 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an agency’s consistent construction of a statute “affords no basis for the perpetuation of a patently erroneous application of the statute”
  • an administrative interpretation should not be the basis for the perpetuation of a patently erroneous application of a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Moss, Bussey, Brailsfoed, Littlejohn, JJ-

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.