Monroe v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contract could not vitiate a statutory right of a contractor to a hearing before a disinterested person
• dispute mechanism set out in Act requires disinterested person to hear appeals, and private con- tractor could not contract with the county to have his administrative appeal heard by county executive
• an employee is not a disinterested party as required by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).