Skip to main content
· 1/22/1977

Monroe v. Darr

Citations

  • 559 P.2d 322
  • 221 Kan. 281
  • 1977 Kan. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no expert need testify in an invasion of privacy suit and that nervousness and trouble sleeping were sufficient damages to go to the jury
  • a sheriff may be liable for deputies’ warrant-less entry into plaintiff s home where there was no probable cause, no exigent circumstances, and plaintiff did not consent to the entry
  • “It was undisputed that the sheriffs deputies physically intruded upon the seclusion of the plaintiff Monroe. Such intrusion, unless justified by the circumstances, would constitute an actionable invasion of Monroe’s right of privacy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.