Monroe v. Arkansas State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a dismissal for “alleged, but not conceded drug use, might constitute a disciplinary dismissal”
• holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars suits against a state university “for any kind of relief, not merely money damages”
• holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars suits against a state university “for any kind of relief, not merely money damages.”
• holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars suits against a state university “for any kind of relief, not merely money damages”
• holding the doctrine of Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908), bars suits for both money damages and injunctive relief against a state university
• stating that district court erred in allowing the plaintiff to proceed against state university for injunctive relief, and remanding matter to district court for dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).