Monroe Division, Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. Frank A. De Bari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant was entitled to a hearing where there are genuine issues of material fact
• explaining that courts have the discretion to dispense with a security bond where the party requesting an injunction has “considerable assets” and is “able to respond in damages” if the defendant is wrongly enjoined
• allowing a litigant to raise a claim for wrongful injunction damages after the determination of wrongfulness, stating that prior to that point “the claim for damages had not yet arisen”
• remanding case to the district court for an evidentiary hearing because “[d]efendant requested, and was entitled to, a hearing on his claim of damages arising from the wrongful injunction.”
• “Equity comes into play in determining whether there may be recovery and the amount thereof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).