· 9/6/1979
Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. City of Pittsburgh
Citations
- 45 Pa. Commw. 474
- 406 A.2d 351
- 1979 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1934
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining a court's ruling under Hawai‘i Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 60(b)(4) is reviewed de novo
- addressing arguments raised on appeal by a pro se litigant “to the extent (. . .continued) (4) A concise statement of the points of error set forth in separately numbered paragraphs. Each point shall state: (i) the alleged error committed by the court or agency; (ii
- “HRCP Rule 4(c) specifies who is authorized to serve process and does not include service by mail. In turn, HRCP Rule 4(d)(3) requires the method of service on a corporation to be ‘by delivering a copy’ of the summons and complaint to an individual listed therein.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blatt, Bowman, Craig, Crumlish, Disalle, MacPhail, Mencer, Rogers, Wilkinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.