Skip to main content
· 9/6/1979

Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. City of Pittsburgh

Citations

  • 45 Pa. Commw. 474
  • 406 A.2d 351
  • 1979 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining a court's ruling under Hawai‘i Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 60(b)(4) is reviewed de novo
  • addressing arguments raised on appeal by a pro se litigant “to the extent (. . .continued) (4) A concise statement of the points of error set forth in separately numbered paragraphs. Each point shall state: (i) the alleged error committed by the court or agency; (ii
  • “HRCP Rule 4(c) specifies who is authorized to serve process and does not include service by mail. In turn, HRCP Rule 4(d)(3) requires the method of service on a corporation to be ‘by delivering a copy’ of the summons and complaint to an individual listed therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatt, Bowman, Craig, Crumlish, Disalle, MacPhail, Mencer, Rogers, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.