Skip to main content
· 10/15/1883

Monks v. Belden

Citations

  • 80 Mo. 639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sexual assault indictment alleging several acts of assault was duplicitous because it was impossible to know whether jurors all convicted defendant on same act
  • error to consolidate a number of separate felonious sexual assault offenses in one count of an indictment under a general plea of a course of conduct involving several incidents of intentional touching
  • defendant sufficiently asserted constitutional duplicitous argument without using specific term “duplicitous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.