Skip to main content
· 8/18/2005

Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Citations

  • 118 P.3d 37
  • 211 Ariz. 89
  • 458 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
  • 2005 Ariz. App. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to object to an issue in the juvenile court preserves review for fundamental error only
  • stating that a parent's claims of due process and rules violations in termination proceedings were subject to fundamental error review because the parent did not object in the juvenile court
  • applying fundamental error review when party did not object to noncompliance with juvenile court rules of procedure
  • applying “doctrine of fundamental error” to constitutional claim not raised in juvenile court
  • termination hearing sufficient when it included representation by counsel, cross-examination, and opportunity to present evidence and argument
  • termination hearing sufficient when it included representation by counsel, cross-examination, and opportunity to present evidence and argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker, Portley, Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.