· 8/18/2005
Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Citations
- 118 P.3d 37
- 211 Ariz. 89
- 458 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
- 2005 Ariz. App. LEXIS 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to object to an issue in the juvenile court preserves review for fundamental error only
- stating that a parent's claims of due process and rules violations in termination proceedings were subject to fundamental error review because the parent did not object in the juvenile court
- applying fundamental error review when party did not object to noncompliance with juvenile court rules of procedure
- applying “doctrine of fundamental error” to constitutional claim not raised in juvenile court
- termination hearing sufficient when it included representation by counsel, cross-examination, and opportunity to present evidence and argument
- termination hearing sufficient when it included representation by counsel, cross-examination, and opportunity to present evidence and argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barker, Portley, Ehrlich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.