Monfils v. Charles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the necessity of re-election [as union president] and the existence of only intermittent duties together with the nominal compensation and the lack of a profit motive [were] insufficient to classify [the insured’s] activities as a union president a ‘business pursuit.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).