Skip to main content
· 7/5/2006

Moneypenney v. Dawson

Citations

  • 2006 OK 53
  • 141 P.3d 549
  • 2006 Okla. LEXIS 56
  • 2006 WL 1835986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The bar of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense.”
  • “The bar of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense.”
  • “As to any permanent damage Plaintiff claims was caused, the period of limitation would not commence for such permanent' damage to realty until the damage is apparent and it becomes obvious that such damage is of a permanent character.”
  • “For ... temporary damage [caused by a nuisance] a plaintiff may bring successive actions each time the wrong occurs ... and the statute of limitations would bar recovery only for damage occurring more than two years prior to a suit’s filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavender, Watt, Hargrave, Opala, Kauger, Edmondson, Colbert, Winchester, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.