Moncrief Oil International Inc. v. OAO Gazprom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] plaintiff’s or third party’s unilateral activities cannot establish minimum contacts between the defendant and forum state”
• holding that \tortious conduct amounts to sufficient minimum contacts with the state by the defendant to constitutionally permit courts within that state\ to exercise personal jurisdiction
• holding that “tortious conduct amounts to sufficient minimum contacts with the state by the defendant to constitutionally permit courts within that state” to exercise personal jurisdiction
• holding that the alleged misrepresentation claim was not actionable because it concerned the future behavior of the defendant – that he would continue to honor the agreements – rather than an “existing fact”
• holding that the alleged misrepresentation claim was not actionable because it concerned the future behavior of the defendant – that he would continue to honor the agreements – rather than an “existing fact”
• stating that “merely contracting with a resident of the forum state does not establish minimum contacts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).