Skip to main content
· 12/22/1933

Monark Battery Co. v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 188 N.E. 413
  • 354 Ill. 494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the fourth amendment was “the prototype for section 6 of article 2 of our State constitution and no reason is perceived why the latter should not receive the same interpretation as the former”
  • noting that the fourth amendment was \the prototype for section 6 of article 2 of our State constitution and no reason is perceived why the latter should not receive the same interpretation as the former\
  • noting that the fourth amendment was ‘the prototype for section 6 of article 2 of our State constitution and no reason is perceived why the latter should not receive the same interpretation as the former’
  • noting that the fourth amendment was Athe prototype for section 6 of article 2 of our State constitution and no reason is perceived why the latter should not receive the same interpretation as the former@

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.