· 12/22/1933
Monark Battery Co. v. Industrial Commission
Citations
- 188 N.E. 413
- 354 Ill. 494
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the fourth amendment was “the prototype for section 6 of article 2 of our State constitution and no reason is perceived why the latter should not receive the same interpretation as the former”
- noting that the fourth amendment was \the prototype for section 6 of article 2 of our State constitution and no reason is perceived why the latter should not receive the same interpretation as the former\
- noting that the fourth amendment was ‘the prototype for section 6 of article 2 of our State constitution and no reason is perceived why the latter should not receive the same interpretation as the former’
- noting that the fourth amendment was Athe prototype for section 6 of article 2 of our State constitution and no reason is perceived why the latter should not receive the same interpretation as the former@
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.