Monahan's Marine, Inc. v. Boston Whaler, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing anti-competitive dangers of forbidding selective, but non-predatory, price cutting
• recognizing anti-competitive dangers of forbidding ___ selective, but non-predatory, price cutting
• recognizing anti-competitive dangers of forbidding selective, but non-predatory, price cutting
• “evidence of a violation of the Robinson-Patman Act, showing injury only to competitors, does not automatically show a violation of the Sherman Act as well”
• where favoritism in prices for certain dealers was not likely to concentrate the relevant market or drive smaller dealers out, the fact that a disfavored dealer was harmed did not render a price discrimination agreement unreasonable under Sec. 1
• not discussing the Morton Salt rule, but noting that “unlike the Sherman Act, which protects ‘competition not competitors,’ ... the [Robinson-Patman] Act protects those who compete with a favored seller, not just the overall competitive process.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).