Skip to main content
· 8/12/2003

Monahan v. Winn

Citations

  • 276 F. Supp. 2d 196
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14091
  • 2003 WL 21940908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “PLRA exhaustion requirement has no ‘futility’ exception”
  • “[Mjaintaining a full menu of appropriate punishment options is in the public interest.”
  • finding PLRA exhaustion requirement did not apply to habeas action challenging Bureau of Prisons rule impacting execution of criminal sentences and declining to otherwise require exhaustion where it would be futile
  • finding PLRA exhaustion requirement did not apply to habeas action challenging Bureau of Prisons rule impacting execution of criminal sentences and declining to otherwise require exhaustion where it would be futile
  • “No other provision in the United States Code (and certainly nothing in the Sentencing Guidelines) purports to curb that discretion.”
  • “[T]he DOJ’s clampdown on BOP discretion as to place of imprisonment increases punishment for prisoners.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gertner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.