· 8/12/2003
Monahan v. Winn
Citations
- 276 F. Supp. 2d 196
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14091
- 2003 WL 21940908
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “PLRA exhaustion requirement has no ‘futility’ exception”
- “[Mjaintaining a full menu of appropriate punishment options is in the public interest.”
- finding PLRA exhaustion requirement did not apply to habeas action challenging Bureau of Prisons rule impacting execution of criminal sentences and declining to otherwise require exhaustion where it would be futile
- finding PLRA exhaustion requirement did not apply to habeas action challenging Bureau of Prisons rule impacting execution of criminal sentences and declining to otherwise require exhaustion where it would be futile
- “No other provision in the United States Code (and certainly nothing in the Sentencing Guidelines) purports to curb that discretion.”
- “[T]he DOJ’s clampdown on BOP discretion as to place of imprisonment increases punishment for prisoners.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gertner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.