Monahan v. Reyes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CIR ended when “one party . . . clearly demonstrated an intent to end it [and t]his intent was communicated to and understood by the other party to the relationship.”
• highlighting that “there must be ‘mutual intent to form’” and “maintain” the CIR
• because the father acknowledged paternity of the children, there was no basis for an award of fees under RCW 26.26.140

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).