Skip to main content
· 7/7/1998

Monahan v. City of New York Department of Correction

Citations

  • 10 F. Supp. 2d 420
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10130
  • 1998 WL 385152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the challenged regulation “rationally serve[d] the legitimate state interests of verifying officers’ illnesses and preventing malingering”
  • finding that Directive 2262 survived rational basis scrutiny
  • describing the assertion of several plaintiffs that Directive 2262 prevented them from engaging in leisure, social, religious, and family activities and noting that several plaintiffs had difficulties with “logging out” — i.e. requesting permission to leave their residences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rakoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.