· 7/9/1982
Monaghan v. PA. MFRS.'ASS'N INS. CO.
Citations
- 447 A.2d 1037
- 301 Pa. Super. 419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “No-Fault was not intended to be a panacea for all injuries that could be traced to a motor vehicle no matter how far removed from the actual operation of a vehicle”
- \No-Fault was not intended to be a panacea for all injuries that could be traced to a motor vehicle no matter how far removed from the actual operation of a vehicle\
- “... No-Fault was not intended to be a panacea for all injuries that could be traced to a motor vehicle no matter how far removed from the actual operation of such vehicle.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montgomery, Hoffman and Van Der Voort
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.