Skip to main content
· 7/9/1982

Monaghan v. PA. MFRS.'ASS'N INS. CO.

Citations

  • 447 A.2d 1037
  • 301 Pa. Super. 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “No-Fault was not intended to be a panacea for all injuries that could be traced to a motor vehicle no matter how far removed from the actual operation of a vehicle”
  • \No-Fault was not intended to be a panacea for all injuries that could be traced to a motor vehicle no matter how far removed from the actual operation of a vehicle\
  • “... No-Fault was not intended to be a panacea for all injuries that could be traced to a motor vehicle no matter how far removed from the actual operation of such vehicle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montgomery, Hoffman and Van Der Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.