Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court cannot correct clear and unambiguous language for the legislature so as to better serve what the court feels was, or should have been, the legislature’s intent.”
• court cannot alter wording of statute “so as to better serve what the court feels was, or should have been, the legislature’s intent”
• court is not permitted to alter a statute’s wording “so as to better serve what the court feels was, or should have been, the legislature’s intent”
• “[I]t is for the legislature to translate its intent into operational language. This court cannot correct clear and unambiguous language for the legislature so as to better serve what the court feels was, or should have been, the legislature’s intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).