Skip to main content
· 2/18/2011

Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.

Citations

  • 765 F. Supp. 2d 87
  • 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1154
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18562
  • 2011 WL 673926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing reasonableness test as involving consideration of all the surrounding circumstances
  • “In order for a party to obtain expedited discovery . . . it must show good cause.” (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1))
  • “The majority of courts have held . . . that the fact that there was no pending preliminary injunction motion weighed against allowing [a] plaintiff’s motion for expedited discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.