· 2/18/2011
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.
Citations
- 765 F. Supp. 2d 87
- 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1154
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18562
- 2011 WL 673926
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing reasonableness test as involving consideration of all the surrounding circumstances
- “In order for a party to obtain expedited discovery . . . it must show good cause.” (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1))
- “The majority of courts have held . . . that the fact that there was no pending preliminary injunction motion weighed against allowing [a] plaintiff’s motion for expedited discovery.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gorton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.