Skip to main content
· 12/17/1999

Molycorp, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Citations

  • 197 F.3d 543
  • 339 U.S. App. D.C. 73
  • 30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20214
  • 49 ERC (BNA) 1883
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32700
  • 1999 WL 1204342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • non-binding statements of the agency’s view of particular activities was best described as a policy statement
  • noting three criteria for determining when an agency action can constitute the promulgation of a regulation
  • characterizing 42 U.S.C. § 6976(a)(1) as “a limitation on our jurisdiction”
  • characterizing 42 U.S.C. § 6976(a)(1) as “a limitation on our jurisdiction”
  • counsel’s reference to a document’s “advisory role” in enforcement proceedings did not mean that the “document itself would be given any weight at all in enforcement proceedings”
  • focusing on whether agency intends to bind itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman, Rogers, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.