· 12/17/1999
Molycorp, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Citations
- 197 F.3d 543
- 339 U.S. App. D.C. 73
- 30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20214
- 49 ERC (BNA) 1883
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32700
- 1999 WL 1204342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- non-binding statements of the agency’s view of particular activities was best described as a policy statement
- noting three criteria for determining when an agency action can constitute the promulgation of a regulation
- characterizing 42 U.S.C. § 6976(a)(1) as “a limitation on our jurisdiction”
- characterizing 42 U.S.C. § 6976(a)(1) as “a limitation on our jurisdiction”
- counsel’s reference to a document’s “advisory role” in enforcement proceedings did not mean that the “document itself would be given any weight at all in enforcement proceedings”
- focusing on whether agency intends to bind itself
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Silberman, Rogers, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.