Molski v. Mandarin Touch Restaurant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, where money damages are available for supplemental state claims, Title III plaintiffs frequently focus on obtaining damages rather than pursuing accessibility for disabled individuals
• “The result . . . is that the means for enforcing the ADA (attorney’s fees) have become more important and desirable than the end (accessibility for disabled individuals
• “The Court simply does not believe that Molski suffered 13 nearly identical injuries, generally to the same part of his body, in the course of performing the same activity, over a five-day period.”
• “The Court simply does not believe that Molski suffered 13 nearly identical injuries, gen- erally to the same part of his body, in the course of perform- ing the same activity, over a five-day period.”
• \After examining Plaintiffs extensive collection of law suits. . . .\
• “After examining Plaintiff’s extensive collection of law- suits . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).