· 7/1/2004
Molski v. Franklin
Citations
- 222 F.R.D. 433
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12578
- 2004 WL 1497909
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the trial coui’t could not act until a “mandate ha[d] been ... received”
- suggesting that, upon remand, a new trial might be required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stiven
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.