Skip to main content
· 7/1/2004

Molski v. Franklin

Citations

  • 222 F.R.D. 433
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12578
  • 2004 WL 1497909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the trial coui’t could not act until a “mandate ha[d] been ... received”
  • suggesting that, upon remand, a new trial might be required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stiven

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.