Molski v. Arby's Huntington Beach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff suffered actual and imminent injury when he alleged (1) that he visited an accom- modation in the past; (2) that he was currently deterred from returning to the accommodation because of ADA violations; and (3
• imposing a pre-filing order on an ADA plaintiffs attorneys, in part, due to “an unusual number of settlements” evidencing an extortion scheme
• “the filing of hundreds of lawsuits may impact Mr. Molski’s credibility and the believability of his assertions that he intends to and will return to Arby’s”
• “It is rudimentary law that . . . two things are necessary to create jurisdiction. . . . The Constitution must have given the court the capacity to take it, and an act of Congress must have supplied it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).