Molloy v. Primus Automotive Financial Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff’s allegation that defendant “is in the business of . . . collecting monies” was sufficient to allege defendant was a debt collector within meaning of the FDCPA
• recommendation of magistrate judge affirmed by the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).