Molesworth v. University of Vermont

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiff’s assertion that she could seek declaratory relief on her claim that she was entitled to resident in- state tuition, where “the Legislature ha[d] delegated authority to the Trustees of the University of Vermont to determine eligibility for reduced tuition charges”
• superior court review of university’s in-state tuition eligibility determinations was available under Rule 75; Declaratory Judgment Act did not increase or enlarge superior court’s jurisdiction
• University’s determination of student’s residency status is governmental action reviewable in superior court pursuant to V.R.C.P. 75
• Rule 75 review of decision denying student resident tuition status confined to review of university residency officer’s quasi-judicial action and limited to addressing substantial questions of law affecting merits of case
• certiorari review “confined to addressing substantial questions of law affecting the merits of the case.”
• certiorari review “confined to addressing substantial questions of law affecting the merits of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).