Mole v. Millard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no evidence in support of the “overbreadth” claim was introduced at the hearing, and the requests were not over-broad
• documents in claim files of hospital and its insurer not work product because “no evidence showing any involvement of an attorney in the case prior to or during the generation of the documents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).