Moldenhauer v. Tazewell-Pekin Consolidated Communications Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “these factors are certainly relevant in deciding whether an employer-employee relationship exists,” but they are not “the only relevant factors, or even the most important”
• noting that “it would be foolhardy to suggest that these are the only relevant factors, or even the most important”
• noting that Wisconsin’s minimum wage law “require[s] at least as much of a showing of control as the FLSA.”
• discussing joint-employer factors, including whether the company controlled pay and benefits, supervised daily activities, or determined salaries
• acknowledging the four Bonnette factors are relevant but declining to adopt them as the “only relevant factors, or even the most important”
• construing joint- employer status under the FMLA and noting that it “mirrors” the corresponding FLSA regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).