Skip to main content
· 8/8/2005

Mojica v. 4311 WILSHIRE, LLC

Citations

  • 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 887
  • 131 Cal. App. 4th 1069
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 9570
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6999
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Mudd to the change in statute of limitations at issue here
  • applying the rule of Mudd v. McColgan, 30 Cal.2d 463, 183 P.2d 10 (1947), that, under settled law of California, an amendment which enlarges a period of limitations applies to matters that are not already barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.