Moity v. Louisiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statutory change of state retirement age as applied to persons who were state employees prior to the change “did not interfere with investment-backed expectations,” “since there were no contractual rights”
• statutory change in state retirement law requiring female employees to work until age 55 to receive full retirement benefits instead of age 50, as under the prior law, did not have severe economic impact where prior law already imposed this requirement on male employees
• characterizing change in pension plan that increases retirement age

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).