Skip to main content
· 11/8/1966

Moises Rivas v. United States

Citations

  • 368 F.2d 703
  • 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an alimentary canal search is a nqnrou-tine border search that requires some particularized suspicion
  • holding that an alimentary canal search is a nonroutine border search that requires some particularized suspicion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers, Barnes, Cecil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.