MOISES ESPINOZA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “where the protesting carriers do not presently have the business, it would seem that the grant of it to a newcomer would have an adverse effect on them only in the unusual case”
• \[T]he 1957 amendments changed the result of our decision in United States v. Contract Steel Carriers ... by giving the Commission power to limit the number of contracts which a contract carrier can maintain.\
• ”[T]he 1957 amendments changed the result of our decision in United States v. Contract Steel Carriers ... by giving the Commission power to limit the number of contracts which a contract carrier can maintain.”
• dissenting opinion of Mr, Justice Frankfurter
• dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).