Moir v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tenants of federally subsidized low-income housing are entitled to notice of proposed rent increases and the opportunity to present written objections
• tenants of federally financed low-cost housing have legitimate expectation, based on statute providing funding, so as to entitle them to procedural due process before rent increase
• the standards for state action under the fourteenth amendment are identical to those used for determining the existence of federal action under the fifth amendment
• tenants in federally subsidized § 221(d)(3) housing project have a legitimate, objectively justifiable claim that they will continue to receive the benefits of low cost housing.
• because of potential delay, full hearing before rent increases become effective is not required
• “standards utilized to find federal action for purposes of the Fifth Amendment are identical to those employed to detect state action subject to the strictures of the Fourteenth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).